Colluding Crime Syndicate

The world as we know it is increasingly moving away from being an interconnected web of nation-states, with citizens at the heart of the decision-making process, towards a network dominated by powerful organizations. This network of institutions, including governments, multinational corporations, media conglomerates, law enforcement agencies, and militaries, to name but a few, has managed to weave a narrative that often disguises its true nature. Far from being the servants of the people, these entities frequently operate as if they were members of a global crime syndicate, driven by a common ideology and the determination to enforce it at all costs.

To be clear, this analysis does not propose that every person involved in these institutions is corrupt, as most are just workers doing a job for bosses without the slightest intent to subvert public interest or duty. However, the systemic issues present in the global establishment, specifically its lack of transparency, accountability, and its propensity for self-interest, breed an environment conducive to manipulation and exploitation.

There is an unspoken contract between these entities. Governments, for instance, use legislation and regulatory frameworks to shape public behavior, whilst corporations mold consumer patterns and lifestyles to align with the prescribed narrative. Meanwhile, media conglomerates control information flow, shaping perceptions and beliefs, and law enforcement agencies and militaries serve as the establishment’s muscle, ensuring compliance with the status quo.

Simultaneously, there exists a disturbing symbiosis among how these entities coordinate power, influence, authority, and control. The establishment thrives on its ability to shape societal structures, dictate the rules of the game, and define the narrative. All while ensuring that the costs, risks, and fallout are shouldered by those least able to bear them.

Governments may offer corporations favourable legislation in return for financial support. Corporations may exert influence over media outlets to steer the public narrative. Media outlets may leverage their platforms to control the flow of information and shape public opinion. The police and military, ostensibly the guardians of societal order, can be used to enforce this agenda.

At the helm of this global enterprise are governments, those bodies elected or otherwise, whose primary function should be to serve the needs and protect the rights of their citizens. However, many have become more interested in the pursuit of power, wealth, and influence on the global stage rather than addressing the interests of those who entrusted them with power in the first place.

Globalism is the new playing field. The nation-state, with its citizen-centric focus, is seen as old-fashioned, a hindrance to the smooth functioning of global networks of power and profit. This shift to a global-centric perspective seems to come at the cost of national interests and, more importantly, the interests of the ordinary citizens who are seen as mere pawns in this grand game of global politics and economics.

The media, once the so-called “Fourth Estate”, were previously the guardians of truth, holding power to account. Today, media conglomerates wield narratives like weapons, shaping perceptions to suit their agendas, and determining which stories reach the public eye and which do not. Information, the lifeblood of democracy, has been weaponized to serve the powerful.

Moreover, the media’s relationship with the government is far from adversarial. They share a symbiotic relationship, with each feeding off the other. The media dutifully regurgitates government rhetoric, under the guise of “access journalism”, choosing not to bite the hand that feeds it press passes and the inside track to power. As a result, press conferences have degenerated into insipid performances, with journalists rarely venturing off-script to question or challenge the powers that be.

Similarly, the media’s relationship with its corporate advertisers dictates what is deemed newsworthy. Critical stories are routinely spiked if they risk offending the big-ticket advertisers, thus reducing the so-called “Fourth Estate” to little more than a stenographer for authority. The advent of social media has merely added another layer of complexity to this toxic mix, facilitating the rapid dissemination of “fake news”, while also providing the establishment with new tools for surveillance and control.

We live in an era of unprecedented media saturation, where the line between news and propaganda is not just blurred but obliterated. The mainstream media is no longer content to report the news; instead, it shapes it, casting narratives in the mold that best suits its interests and those of the syndicate that controls it.

The media pushes propaganda, propagates false narratives, and limits public discourse to carefully curated topics that serve its agenda, while suppressing news that threatens to expose the underbelly of the corrupt establishment. What we perceive as the “news” is, in fact, often a heavily choreographed performance, with the media serving as both the puppet and the puppeteer.

Consider the spectacle of news today, filled with narratives that seem meticulously crafted, facts that are often distorted or disregarded altogether. The aim is not to enlighten but to obfuscate, to direct public opinion along certain well-trodden paths while avoiding the murky quagmires that threaten the status quo. The specter of “fake news” is invoked not just for falsehoods, but inconvenient truths.

This skewed version of reality is maintained by a careful control of discourse. Intelligence agency directors, once retired, often find comfortable berths in media companies. From these positions, they act as gatekeepers, ensuring that the media narrative toes the line. The interchangeability of media and intelligence personnel casts a troubling light on the supposedly free and independent nature of our news.

But it’s not just a question of narrative control. There is a nefarious art to the sin of omission. Stories that should shake the corridors of power to their very foundations are suppressed, relegated to the dustbin of irrelevance, their existence denied by a complicit silence.

These phenomena beg the question: to whom does the media answer? It’s increasingly evident that it’s not the public. Rather, it is a part of the crime syndicate, tied by innumerable threads to corporations, governments, and the machinery of power. The media has become the syndicate’s mouthpiece, and our understanding of the world is framed by its narratives.

Law enforcement and the judiciary, two of the sturdiest bulwarks of society, supposedly designed to protect us, the citizens. The police, those entrusted with maintaining order, have increasingly become the henchmen of a syndicate that serves not justice but power. Tasked with enforcing the laws of the land, they are often compelled to exercise this duty selectively, targeting not just the miscreants and malefactors but those who dare to challenge the status quo.

Dissidents who dare to air their disagreement with the prevailing narrative are rounded up under increasingly creative interpretations of existing legislation, silenced under the guise of maintaining public order and national security. The police, whose duty is to serve and protect the citizenry, are now used to intimidate and quash dissent, turning the law into a weapon of political convenience.

This twisting of justice extends to the courtroom. The judiciary, the final arbiter of justice and fairness, the institution that should be most resistant to the overreaches of power, often finds itself dancing to the syndicate’s tune. Judges, whether by choice or pressure, align themselves with the prevailing winds of political expedience, interpreting the law in a way that suits the government of the day and neutralizes its ideological adversaries.

The application of law is no longer about justice but about the imposition of a particular ideological narrative. The courts, instead of serving as a check on the misuse of power, often act as the syndicate’s legitimizing arm, providing the veneer of legality to its actions. The scales of justice are no longer balanced by truth and fairness but are tipped by power and influence.

The military, traditionally seen as the defender of national integrity and peace, increasingly serves as the global establishment’s muscle, flexing its might to cow non-compliant nations into submission. It’s no longer just about defense or even maintaining peace; it’s about power, control, and economic gain. Wars, sadly, have become lucrative business opportunities, a fact that’s at odds with their human cost.

To understand the breadth and depth of this issue, consider the military-industrial complex. This phrase, coined by President Dwight D. Eisenhower, refers to the intimate relationship between the military establishment and the industries that support it. The symbiosis between these entities is disturbing, to say the least.

Weapons manufacturers produce the tools of warfare, reaping handsome profits in the process. These companies are intimately connected with the political establishment, contributing to election campaigns, hiring former military officers and government officials, and maintaining a robust presence in Washington through armies of lobbyists. In this way, they exert a profound influence over both foreign and defense policy, ensuring the perpetuation of conflicts that keep their order books full.

Meanwhile, the political establishment, both domestic and international, plays its part in this theatre of war. Politicians receive campaign contributions and lucrative job offers once their terms end, ensuring their loyalty to the cause. Meanwhile, trillions of taxpayer dollars intended for defense are routinely misappropriated, disappearing into the abyss of overpriced contracts, cost overruns, and outright fraud.

Corporations have become the torchbearers of the dominant ideology, using their considerable power to shape public thought and behavior. They are more than willing to sacrifice short-term profits for the sake of ideological enforcement. It’s a transformation that has turned these entities into private wings of an overarching regime, rather than merely being neutral merchants delivering the products and services the public demands.

This shift is most apparent in sectors such as technology, where a handful of corporations control vast swathes of the digital landscape, and in media, where a few conglomerates dominate the airwaves. These industries have become gatekeepers, controlling what ideas are deemed acceptable, which voices are amplified, and which are suppressed. They are actively engaged in shaping the narrative, pushing a particular ideological line, and punishing those who deviate from it.

However, what’s particularly troubling is the ideological nature of these relationships. It used to be the case that corporations were primarily profit-driven, and their activities could be influenced by market forces. Consumers had the power to vote with their wallets, and corporations had to respond to these market signals to survive. Today, that model is increasingly being supplanted by a new one, in which ideology often takes precedence over profit.

The same is true for other organizations within this global crime syndicate. Governments are increasingly acting to protect the interests of the establishment, rather than their citizens. The media, rather than serving as a check on power, often acts as a mouthpiece for the dominant ideology. Law enforcement and military organizations are utilized to quash dissent and maintain the status quo.

One of the most potent symbols of this detachment from national responsibility is the issue of mass migration. Millions of people uprooted, used as pawns in a game that benefits the powerful. It’s a colossal experiment, the repercussions of which are yet to be fully understood. The traditional fabric of societies is being eroded in favour of transient, rootless populations who can be more easily controlled, pacified, and exploited.

What we’re witnessing is a form of soft totalitarianism, where power is consolidated in the hands of the few, and ideological conformity is enforced, not through brute force, but through control over information, financial systems, and social norms. It is time we looked beyond the comforting illusion of democracy and free markets to recognise the unsettling reality beneath. The syndicate thrives not because of a grand conspiracy, but due to a shared desire amongst the powerful to retain their status at the cost of the powerless.

And the most alarming part? The seeming impunity with which all of this is done. Whether it’s the collapse of economies, the displacement of populations, or the erosion of civil liberties, the powerful seem immune to the fallout of their action, while ordinary citizens bear the brunt.

This dystopian reality isn’t an easy pill to swallow. But acknowledging this bleak tableau is the first step in resisting it. Institutions have been subverted, but they are not irredeemable. The global crime syndicate thrives on apathy, ignorance, and fear. It is by nurturing informed skepticism, by fostering a culture of questioning, and by refusing to let fear muzzle our voices, that we can begin to reclaim these institutions. As we lift the veil on this spectacle, we must remember that in the war for truth, silence is complicity.

Leave a Reply